Authors:
Historic Era:
Historic Theme:
Subject:
November/December 2003 | Volume 54, Issue 6

        Authors:
Historic Era:
Historic Theme:
Subject:
November/December 2003 | Volume 54, Issue 6
 The duel between the ironclads  Monitor and  Merrimack on March 9,  Another controversial issue is the question of who designed the ironclad revamping of the  Merrimack , originally a  In a controversy that dates back to  The finely detailed three-view pen-and-  After their clash at Hampton Roads,  The  Merrimack , unfortunately, will
 1862, remains a subject of animated controversy to this day. The disputes extend
 even to the proper name for the Confederate ship (the Rebels called it  Virginia )
 and the outcome of the battle (although partisans of both sides claim victory, a recent attempt by one of our editors to call it a standoff was overruled by a superior). 
 wooden vessel that was sunk when the
 Union abandoned the navy yard at Norfolk, Virginia. The plans were drawn by
 John L. Porter, an experienced naval constructor, with advice from John Mercer
 Brooke, a gifted scientist who also designed innovative ordnance. But what was the relative importance of the two men’s contributions? 
 the 187Os, Brooke supporters contend
 that Porter acted merely as a draftsman, while Porter backers say Brooke
 was just an adviser who tried to hog
 the credit after the war ended. An important step in clarifying the  Merrimack ’s
 parentage came this summer, when
 the Mariners’ Museum, in Newport News, Virginia, bought Porter’sconstruction drawing from a collector who had obtained it from the Porter family. 
 ink drawing measures six feet by two feet
 and contains a wealth of clues about how
 the design developed. Erasure marks show
 that Porter originally included a stern pilothouse, which was removed at Brooke’s
 insistence. Brooke also redesigned the gunports, added more armor and a submerged bow, andplaced a ram on the front of the vessel.
 neither vessel lasted out the year. The
 Monitor served nine monthsof intermittent patrol duty and then sank in a storm
 on the final day of 1862. In the last three
 years, Navy divers have begun to raise
 it piece by piece. The official repository
 for the salvaged sections is the Mariners’
 Museum, where the  Monitor Center, which will preserve documents, drawings, and
 other artifacts related to both ironclads involved in the epochal confrontation, is scheduled to open in 2007. 
 never be raised; it was blown up to keep
 it from falling into enemy hands when
 Union forces recaptured Norfolk Navy Yard in May 1862. Documents like Porter’s construction drawing are thus invaluable in illuminating the steps leading up to the battlethat changed naval warfare forever.